More Case Studies
A mid-market private equity fund with $2.8B in assets under management held 12 portfolio companies spanning B2B software, business services, healthcare services, and industrial technology sectors. Across the portfolio, total annual software spend had grown to $148M — a figure that had increased significantly following several add-on acquisitions and had never been systematically benchmarked.
The fund's Operating Partner for Technology identified software spend as an underexplored value creation lever during the fund's annual portfolio review. While the fund had historically focused on revenue growth and EBITDA margin improvement through cost reduction in labor and facilities, software spend had been treated as a fixed overhead — particularly in companies where IT was embedded in the product or operations function rather than centralized.
The Operating Partner commissioned a full portfolio benchmark analysis with two objectives: establish a baseline view of each company's software spend relative to market, and create a prioritized value creation roadmap for each portfolio company ahead of the fund's 18–24 month exit planning horizon.
Software spend in PE portfolio companies is structurally prone to overpayment for three reasons that are specific to the PE ownership context. First, portfolio companies typically negotiate as standalone entities at their current scale — not as part of a fund portfolio with aggregate buying leverage. Second, PE ownership timelines mean companies often keep inherited technology contracts from pre-acquisition periods without renegotiating. Third, PE-backed companies are frequently under-resourced in IT procurement sophistication relative to their corporate counterparts of similar revenue size.
The valuation amplification point was central to the Operating Partner's business case. At the fund's typical exit multiple, $1M in annual recurring software savings added approximately $5M in terminal enterprise value. The $22M in annual savings ultimately identified represented over $110M in potential exit value creation — material at any fund size, but especially significant for a mid-market fund where each portfolio company's exit outcome directly drives fund returns.
The engagement ran in three phases over 12 weeks, designed to align with the fund's portfolio company governance rhythm and exit planning timeline.
Each portfolio company's top-20 software vendors by spend were submitted for benchmark analysis simultaneously. 48-hour turnaround per vendor. Delivered a portfolio heat map showing each company's software spend vs. market median, ranked by savings opportunity and time-to-realize.
For each company, a full vendor contract review for the top-10 savings opportunities. Contract term analysis, auto-escalation identification, over-provisioning audit, and vendor-specific negotiation strategy. Delivered company-level benchmark reports and negotiation playbooks.
Fund-level value creation roadmap: prioritized list of 47 negotiations across 12 companies ranked by impact, with implementation sequencing that respected renewal windows and management bandwidth. Quarterly benchmark refresh included for ongoing portfolio governance.
"We had been leaving money on the table across the entire portfolio for years. Every company was negotiating independently, paying scale-inappropriate prices, and auto-renewing contracts we hadn't reviewed since before acquisition. The benchmark scan was like turning on a light in a dark room — suddenly we could see exactly where the waste was."— Operating Partner, Technology, Mid-Market PE Fund
The portfolio scan revealed that 10 of 12 companies were paying above market median for at least one of their top-5 software vendors. Four companies were paying above market median for all five of their top vendors — a pattern the Operating Partner described as "systemic procurement neglect" driven by the PE ownership timeline incentive to avoid long-term vendor commitments.
The fund implemented the value creation plan through a structured renegotiation programme executed over 9 months. Each portfolio company's CFO and relevant IT lead were briefed on their specific benchmark findings, with the Operating Partner's team available to support high-value negotiations directly.
The Oracle situation — a B2B software company paying pricing calibrated to a company one-third its current size — was addressed first and became the fund's reference case. Oracle accepted a pricing reset based on current headcount and scale benchmarks, reducing annual Oracle spend by $2.8M. The company's CEO reported that the negotiation "took one meeting" once they had the benchmark data showing the scale mismatch quantified in dollar terms.
The Microsoft EA renegotiations across four portfolio companies were structured as a coordinated programme, with the fund presenting each renegotiation to Microsoft as part of a broader portfolio relationship. While Microsoft negotiates each EA independently, the signaling of portfolio-level coordination created additional leverage in three of the four renegotiations.
Following the initial engagement, the fund established a standing benchmark programme: every portfolio company's software renewals are submitted for benchmark analysis 90 days before expiry as standard practice. The Operating Partner receives a monthly dashboard showing benchmark status across the portfolio, upcoming renewal windows, and savings achieved year-to-date.
The fund has since applied the same methodology to three new acquisitions during the due diligence phase — using benchmark data to quantify software spend optimization as a specific value creation opportunity before close, incorporating it into deal models and 100-day plans.
"Software benchmarking has become part of our standard acquisition playbook. We now model it as a value creation lever alongside the traditional operational improvement metrics — because the data shows it delivers faster and more predictably than most other levers we have. $22M identified in a portfolio of $148M spend is a 15% improvement rate. That's not incremental. That's meaningful."— Managing Partner, Mid-Market PE Fund
PE fund software benchmarking delivers value at two levels: as a one-time portfolio diagnostic that surfaces systemic overpayment, and as an ongoing governance mechanism that prevents future overpayment accumulation. The EBITDA impact flows directly to exit value at the fund's multiple — making every dollar saved worth a multiple in terminal value. Funds that benchmark before acquisition can incorporate software optimization into deal models and 100-day plans, accelerating the value creation timeline. Funds that benchmark existing portfolio companies typically find the highest-impact opportunities in the companies that have never been systematically renegotiated — which, in most mid-market PE portfolios, is the majority.
Running PE portfolio companies or conducting M&A due diligence? VendorBenchmark provides dedicated portfolio-level pricing intelligence under NDA.
PE funds and operating partners: contact us about dedicated portfolio benchmarking coverage and M&A due diligence programmes.
